Home Moss Flora of China
Name Search
About
Moss Checklist
Moss Flora
Guide to Authors
Participants
Glossary
!Entodon challengeri var. zikaiweiensis (Paris) R.L. Hu Search in NYBG Virtual HerbariumSearch in JSTOR Plant ScienceSearch in SEINetSearch in African Plants Database at Geneva Botanical Garden Decrease font Increase font Restore font
 

Published In: Moss Flora of China, English Version 7: 175. 2008. (Moss Fl. China) Name publication detail
 

Project Name Data (Last Modified On 3/31/2009)
Acceptance : Accepted
Project Data     (Last Modified On 3/31/2009)
General Reference:

Illustration & Map     (Last Modified On 3/31/2009)
Related Objects:
Illustrations: Not available.


Click here for distribution map.

Map: Entodon challengeri var. zikaiweiensis (Paris) R.L. Hu (Distribution in China)

Distribution     (Last Modified On 3/31/2009)
Distribution:
Habitat: on tree trunks; alt. unknown.
Distribution: endemic to China.
 

Specimens Examined     (Last Modified On 3/31/2009)
Specimens Examined:
Chinese specimens examined: Heilongjiang: Xiao Xing An Ling (Mt.), C. Gao 200 (IFSBH). Jilin: Longtan, C. Gao 58 (IFSBH). Shanghai: Mt. Sheshan, R.-L. Hu 17 (HSNU).
 

Notes     (Last Modified On 3/31/2009)
general taxon notes:
The taxonomic status of Entodon compressus var. parvisporus X.-S. Wen & Z.-T. Zhao cannot be verified, because no material of this variety has been examined. When it is confirmed, this variety will likely be a synonym or a variety of E. challengeri.

 

Export To PDF Export To Word

 

4b. Entodon challengeri var. zikaiweiensis (Paris) R.-L. Hu, comb. nov.   柱蒴娟藓徐家汇变种   zhu shuo juan xian xu jia hui bian zhong
Entodon zikaiweiensis Paris, Rev. Bryol. 36: 10. 1909. Type: China. Shanghai, Zi Ka Wei, Courtois & Henry s.n.
Entodon compressus var. zikaiweiensis (Paris) R.-L. Hu, Bryologist 86: 214. 1983.
Entodon nanocarpus var. zikaiweiensis (Paris) C. Gao, Fl. Musc. Chinae Boreali-Orient. 322. 1977.
 
Entodon challengeri var. zikaiweiensis differs from E. challengeri var. challengeri by its smaller leaves (0.7–0.9 mm × 0.3–0.8 mm vs. 1.5–1.8 mm × ca. 0.8 mm) and its shorter, broader median leaf cells (20–30 µm × 7–10 µm vs. 60–65 µm × 5.0–5.5 µm).
 
 
 
 
© 2016 Missouri Botanical Garden - 4344 Shaw Boulevard - Saint Louis, Missouri 63110